Home » A Hijab on the Bench? German Courts Say No

A Hijab on the Bench? German Courts Say No

by خانم هاشمی

German courts, by issuing rulings that bar judges who wear the hijab from serving, have deemed the headscarf a barrier to neutrality in courtrooms — a decision that has faced domestic and international criticism.


A Headscarf as Grounds for Disqualification

A judicial panel in Germany ruled that the hijab undermines neutrality in the courts and therefore barred a Muslim woman wearing a headscarf from serving as a judge.

The Hesse Administrative Court announced its decision on Monday, confirming the authorities’ move to reject the woman’s application.

In a statement, the Darmstadt court acknowledged that the attorney’s religious freedom holds significant constitutional weight. However, it ruled that this right is overshadowed by other legal principles, including the state’s neutrality and the religious freedom of those participating in court proceedings.


The Interview and the Court’s Rationale

According to the court’s statement, during her interview the applicant was asked whether she would remove her headscarf when interacting with participants in the courtroom. She clearly stated that she would not.

Officials in Hesse rejected her application, arguing that wearing a symbolic religious garment during judicial procedures violates the principle of state neutrality and could undermine public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial system.


Similar Cases in Lower Saxony

In October, a court in Lower Saxony issued a similar ruling against a woman who intended to serve as a lay judge while wearing a headscarf.

The Higher Regional Court of Braunschweig ruled that state law prohibits judges from displaying visible symbols that reflect political, religious, or ideological views during trials — a restriction that also applies to lay judges.


Growing Criticism and Concerns

Advocates of religious freedom criticized the recent rulings on social media, arguing that Germany’s interpretation of state neutrality has turned into a tool for discrimination rather than impartiality.

Critics say such rulings disproportionately affect Muslim women and create significant barriers to their participation in legal professions and public service.

en.jahanbanou.ir

From: IQNA

You may also like

Leave a Comment

All rights of this website belongs to Jahan Banou News agency. There are no obstacles in re-publishing the contents of this platform by mentioning the reference.