The decision to have children or not is always a personal choice, but few people in their youth consider the long-term consequences of this decision.
Now, many middle-aged individuals who once saw not having children as a form of freedom are facing a new reality: they have not only lost their elderly parents, but they also have no one to continue the narrative of their lives.
This situation is not merely an individual issue; it reflects broader changes in today’s societies. Declining birth rates combined with increasing lifespans have created a combination that leaves many in middle age confronting an emotional and social void. Those who once thought life without children would be lighter and freer now sometimes grapple with the question of who will preserve their memories or be by their side in their old age.
From a psychological perspective, humans naturally seek meaning and continuity. Children, even if they only partially fulfill this search, play a significant role in individuals’ sense of belonging and emotional survival. When this link is absent, some confront a kind of unfamiliarity with themselves; it’s as if a part of their identity remains unanswered.
Of course, economic issues might seem like a convenient excuse for the younger generation not to have children. But reports indicate that some of these individuals, upon reaching the second half of life, suddenly become aware of other dimensions of this choice – dimensions perhaps less considered in their youth.
Perhaps the core question is this: In a world where traditional family structures are transforming, how can new support networks and meaning-making systems be created? The answer to this question is important not only for childless individuals, but for any society moving towards an aging population.
Guardian